<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for Intel launches Core Duo T2700 2.33GHz processor</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/29/intel-launches-core-duo-t2700-2-33ghz-processor/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for Intel launches Core Duo T2700 2.33GHz processor</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel launches Core Duo T2700 2.33GHz processor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/29/intel-launches-core-duo-t2700-2-33ghz-processor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/29/intel-launches-core-duo-t2700-2-33ghz-processor/</guid><description><![CDATA[Take a 1.6 GHz one and clock it to 2.3, I'm sure it's possible. or atleast a 2.16GHz to around 2.3 eh? I might try this when my core duo notebook gets to me. <br><br>Is a slightly higher clock speed really worth the $300+ extra?<br><br>I have seen the difference between a 1.6GHz Core duo and a 2.16GHz one, It really is quite huge, nearly twice as efficient, but twice the price...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The intel guy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2006 7:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel launches Core Duo T2700 2.33GHz processor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/29/intel-launches-core-duo-t2700-2-33ghz-processor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/29/intel-launches-core-duo-t2700-2-33ghz-processor/</guid><description><![CDATA[intel guy --<br><br>That would depend on whether or not you want to sacrifice more battery life. This processor is designed for mobiles and low power consumption so I would assume that overclocking would decrease battery life since it requires more power. At least, this is the scenario for my PDA. <br><br>But no I don't really think it's worth the extra money right now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Boyd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2006 8:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel launches Core Duo T2700 2.33GHz processor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/29/intel-launches-core-duo-t2700-2-33ghz-processor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/29/intel-launches-core-duo-t2700-2-33ghz-processor/</guid><description><![CDATA[Honestly, I don't think it is worth that much money. Think about this way. By the time you drop $600 on this baby..Core Due 2 will be out in about 2 months? So if I am to choose, Core Due 2 is definitely the buy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sunny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2006 9:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel launches Core Duo T2700 2.33GHz processor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/29/intel-launches-core-duo-t2700-2-33ghz-processor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/29/intel-launches-core-duo-t2700-2-33ghz-processor/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's quite exciting at first, then again there is that Dual Core 2 coming out so why rush when all you get is a speed increase just wait around for Dual Core 2 to come out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jhay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2006 10:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Intel launches Core Duo T2700 2.33GHz processor]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/29/intel-launches-core-duo-t2700-2-33ghz-processor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/29/intel-launches-core-duo-t2700-2-33ghz-processor/</guid><description><![CDATA[Man this logo sucks.  They should seriously fire their graphic design artist.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Meltz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 29th 2006 1:26PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>